Martin v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Martin sued Hoffman and Pacenta for injuries caused by tbe concurrent, joint and united negligence of the above-mentioned defendants. The jury returned a verdict against defendants, William Walter Hoffman and Pacenta; the lower court entered a judgment n.o.v. in favor of Pacenta on the ground that he was not guilty of any negligence; and William Walter Hoffman appealed.
Hoffman’s automobile, in which plaintiff was a passenger, was being driven South on Rice’s Mill Road at about 11 p.m. It was traveling 35 miles an hour as it approached Church Road, which runs at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Dayen Et Vir v. Penn Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Platts v. DriscollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Edmondson v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Selly v. CioccaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.