Legal Opinion

Drenzek v. Inmont Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1976No. Civ. No. 13929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages for injuries he allegedly sustained while working at defendant’s factory. Following a *880trial by jury, a verdict was returned against plaintiff and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Facts

On March 30, 1972, plaintiff Christopher Drenzek (hereinafter “plaintiff”) slipped and fell during the course of his work at a paint factory owned and operated by defendant Inmont Corporation (hereinafter “defendant”). On that date, plaintiff, age 24, was employed as a security guard by Wells Fargo Security…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Perry v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Timmons v. Assembly of God Church of Van Nuys No. 212California Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API