Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1944No. 14624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

We are first confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the supersedeas bond.

There is no alternative prayer to require a good and sufficient bond in the event the bond filed is found insufficient by this court.

This is a suit for specific performance. No other relief is sought, and the subject matter of the contract is real property.

Judgment was rendered requiring the defendants below to specifically perform the contract of sale made with the plaintiff. The defendants gave notice of appeal, requested the trial court to fix the amount of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. RuskTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Lucas v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Burkitt v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Starkey v. Texas Farm Mortg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Hooser v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham v. FORT WORTH TENT & AWNING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Jones v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Culbertson v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API