Legal Opinion

Galluzzo v. Mannino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

There is no dispute as to the facts upon this appeal. The defendant Antonio Mannino had for some years conducted a business in real estate, insurance, loans, steamship and foreign exchange, musical instruments, the local agency for the II Progresso Italo-American Newspaper, and a United States sub-Post Office branch, upon property owned by him in Bridgeport. On or about May 1st, 1926, he sold the business to the plaintiffs for $1,800, exclusive of the' real estate and loan business which he retained for himself. At that time he also agreed not to become interested in any similar line of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lowell v. StrahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Presby v. . BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Mullins v. NordlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Roosevelt v. . HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buckeye Development Co. v. FeingoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Aiello v. AustrianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Whitely v. Sebas, No. Cv90 03 17 83s (Aug. 20, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API