Legal Opinion
Aiello v. Austrian
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 1984No. 2458PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This suit was brought for damages claimed to have arisen from the defendants’ alleged breach of a lease provision prohibiting assignment of the lease or subletting without the lessors’ permission. The trial court found there was no assignment but rendered judgment for the amount still owing for rent. The plaintiffs appeal1 claiming there was an assignment as a matter oflaw.2 We agree with the trial court’s determination that no assignment occurred.
*466The facts are undisputed. The plaintiffs executed a lease in 1964 with the defendants, who are physicians, to rent premises for the defendants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sexton v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Emery v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
- B. J. Galligan & Co. v. P. S. M., Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1921
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Barlow Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Buckeye Development Co. v. FeingoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aiello v. AustrianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984