Legal Opinion

People v. Sobczak-Obetts

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 2000No. Docket 214787PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

In this case, this panel is called on to review a state trial court’s decision to suppress evidence seized under a federal search warrant but used in a state prosecution. The lower court suppressed the evidence because the federal warrant did not recite the basis for probable cause or have attached to it the affidavit in support of probable cause, as required by state statute, MCL 780.654; MSA 28.1259(4). No affidavit was attached because federal law contains no such requirement, and a federal magistrate had ordered the affidavit sealed. Because I find that our Supreme Court’s decision in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. MotenMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. DarwichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. BulesMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. GalntMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. ChapinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API