Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Anstey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2006No. Docket 128368Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

Today the majority takes its most recent stride in eroding the statutory and constitutional rights of criminal defendants. Despite the Legislature’s clear intent to bestow the right at issue, the majority elects to divest this Court of the ability to redress a violation of the right. Faced with a complaint that a police officer prohibited defendant from exercising his legislatively sanctioned constitutional right to an independent chemical test, the majority’s magic wand of an opinion makes the right disappear. Today’s edict puts Michigan citizens on notice that when the Legislature grants an…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API