Legal Opinion

People v. Bules

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant, by exceptions before sentence, brings for review his conviction of a violation of the prohibition law. Under a search warrant his home was entered by officers and whisky and whisky mash seized. Before trial he moved suppression of the evidence so seized, claiming the warrant was void. This motion was denied and at the trial the liquor and the warrant went in evidence. The part of the search warrant material here was as follows:

“Whereas there has been filed with the undersigned an affidavit that intoxicating liquors are being manufactured, possessed, sold, furnished and given away…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MotenMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Goodman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Pueblo v. Rivera de JesúsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API