Legal Opinion

Perry v. Venable

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1938No. 3616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, Chief Justice.

This suit was filed originally by J. M. McDavid against Cloteel Perry, Louise Womack, who are his sisters, R. H. Venable, and others. The husbands of Cloteel Perry and Louise, Womack were joined as party defendants. The suit involved certain described land in Rusk county, Tex. McDavid sought partition of the surface estate among himself and his said sisters. He also sought recovery of alleged interest in the property from several defendants, including R. H. Venable. The suit as against all defendants, except Mrs. Perry and Mrs. Womack, was in the usual form of trespass…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. RunnelsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Stone v. City of WylieTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Wells v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Baker v. WestcottTexas Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuklies v. ReinertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Central Power & Light Co. v. HederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Davis v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE FIGHTERS' v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE FIGHTERS' v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API