Legal Opinion

Davis v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1939No. 2131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

By motion for rehearing appellant raises the contention that even though the statement of facts as filed is not full and complete, appellee’s remedy is not to have same stricken from the record but the burden rests on him to file a correct statement of facts in the lower court and then move to have same substituted in this court in lieu of the one now on file. In support of this contention, appellant cites Sanders Nursery Co. v. J. C. Engelman, 128 Tex. 102, 96 S. W.2d 68, and Garrisofi ,v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 69 S.W.2d 218. In each of the cases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Perry v. VenableCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Sanders Nursery Co. v. J. C. Engelman, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Osbourn v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API