Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Millhouse

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeals, 718 and 954PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The instant case is a consolidation of two appeals. In No. 718, October Term, 1975, certified to this Court pursuant to the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, 1 the appellant, defendant in the court below, (“appellant” herein), contends that Rule 1100 2 requires dismissal of the charges against him. In No. 954, October Term, 1975, the Commonwealth challenges the lower court’s decision to quash the indictments against the appellant. 3 The court found that appellant did not receive timely notice of the presentment of the bills of indictment to the grand jury. Due to our…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. MetzgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. GarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DelauterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API