Legal Opinion

Cadle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1932No. 14929Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Our discussion of the questions urged in the motion for rehearing must be in the light of the facts as understood from the record. We condense them as much as possible. They are much the same as found in the companion cases of Batchelor v. State, No. 15001, reported in 50 S. W. (2d) 1099, and Everett v. State, No. 14489, in which motion for rehearing is overruled this date. The state’s evidence shows the following: Childress went from Waxahachie to Dallas, and under the name of Bill Green made arrangements with parties there to deliver to him five cases…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Marta and Bonado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Willman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Huey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API