Huey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder, his punishment being assessed at ninety-nine years confinement in the penitentiary.
It is unnecessary, we think, to give anything like a statement of the facts. The State relied lárgely upon the testimony of Williams to the effect that when he walked to where the parties were engaged, in the difficulty he heard them talking. His testimony and that of defendant is-at variance as to who began the conversation that finally led 'to the trouble. The great preponderance of the testimony shows that the parties were friendly up to the time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Streight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Christian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Willman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Petty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Hewey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Huey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.