Legal Opinion

In re Barber

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 31, 1922No. 456PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. Petition of Leo K. Barber for return of property.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a petition filed by the above-named petitioner, seeking an order for the return to him by United States prohibition agents of certain malt, hops, rye, sugar, bottles, crocks, jugs, bottle caps, corks, tubing, and similar materials and supplies, together with certain books, letter files, ledgers, papers, records, advertising matter, and stationery used in the conduct of his business of selling hops, malt, and materials, supplies, and other' merchandise of the general line just mentioned, which he alleges were unlawfully seized and taken by them from his premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Fitter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. United States v. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
  4. United States v. Ray & SchultzDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Gandreau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  3. In re Hollywood CabaretCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API