Legal Opinion · Dissent

Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 18, 2017No. Docket Nos. 14-1823, 14-1909, 14-1991, 14-1997, 14-2003Published

1DissentChin, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The Clean Water Act (the “Act”) prohibits the “discharge of any pollutant by any person” from “any point source” to “navigable waters” of the United States, without a permit. 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(12)(A). The question presented is whether a transfer of water containing pollutants from one body of water to another—say, in upstate New York, from the more-polluted Schoharie Reservoir through the Shandaken Tunnel to the less-polluted Esopus Creek—is subject to these provisions.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) takes the position that such a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API