Legal Opinion
Timm v. Maley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 10, 1995No. 91-09137, 90-06629, 91-03931, 91-02379; CA A85268PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Steven Timm, the noncomplying employer (Timm (NCE)), seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order, entered after we remanded for reconsideration, Timm v. Maley, 125 Or App 396, 401, 865 P2d 1315 (1993), holding that he was responsible for claimant’s claim. Timm (NCE) asserts that the order is not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(7); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206, 752 P2d 312 (1988). We affirm.
Timm (NCE) was insured by CNA Insurance Companies (CNA) from October 1986, to March 17,1988. He was in noncomplying status from March 18, 1988, to September…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Timm v. MaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998