Legal Opinion
P.K. Vichare v. Ambac Inc. And Ambac Indemnity Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 27, 1996No. 2014, Docket 96-7201PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge:
P.K. Vichare, plaintiff-appellant, brought suit in the Southern District of New York (Sidney H. Stein, Judge), alleging that defendant AMBAC Indemnity Corp. and its parent AMBAC Inc. (collectively, “AMBAC”) discriminated against him on the basis of race or national origin (Vichare is Indian) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for AMBAC. The jury also delivered a statement concurrent with its verdict. Judge Stein entered judgment for AMBAC. Vic-hare appeals, arguing…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Blyden v. MancusiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Edwards v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Amato v. City of Saratoga SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Colon Ex Rel. Molina v. Bic USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.