Legal Opinion
United States v. John Theodore Glick
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 29, 1972No. 838, Docket 35695PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to reverse a conviction because the trial judge not once, but twice communicated with the jury out of the presence of the defendant (appearing pro se) during the course of the jury’s deliberations.
John Theodore Glick, the appellant here, and seven other defendants 1 were tried before Judge Burke and a jury on six counts relating to the ransacking of offices in the Federal Building in Rochester, New York, on September 6, 1970. 2 Only defendant Gilchrist was represented by counsel.
Since the evidence adduced at the trial is not pertinent to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. CompagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Al TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.