Legal Opinion
In Re Gadolinium Contrast Dyes Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 27, 2008No. MDL No. 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman.
Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in twelve actions have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio. The GE defendants, 1 the Bayer defendants, 2 the Tyco defendants, 3 and defendant Novation, LLC, support centralization, but suggest the Northern District of Ohio as transferee district. Plaintiff in the Northern District of Alabama potentially related action supports centralization, but suggests the District of Colorado as transferee district.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Janus Mutual Funds Investment LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marye Wahl v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Gaillard v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Avaulta Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In Re Glaceau Vitaminwater Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re State Farm Lloyds Hidalgo County Hail Storm LitigationTexas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.