Legal Opinion

Marye Wahl v. General Electric Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2015No. 13-6622PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Marye Wahl appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee General Electric (GE) in her personal-injury action arising out of the development of a rare and serious disease following the administration of one of GE’s drugs. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on Tennessee’s statute of repose. For the reasons below, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

I

Defendant-Appellee General Electric manufactures Omnisean, a gadolinium-based contrast agent approved by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Victoria Looper v. Cook IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. In re Camp Lejeune North Carolina Water Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  3. Allen v. Am. Capital Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  4. AMI Stamping, LLC v. ACE American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Axline v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API