Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 2008No. 05CR1098; A131066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for failure to report as a sex offender. ORS 181.599. His sole assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state did not prove that he failed to report a “change of residence” within the 10-day period required by law. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant is a convicted sex offender, required to report to the appropriate law enforcement agency “[w]ithin 10 days of a change of residence.” ORS 181.596(4)(b)(A). He lived in an apartment in Coos Bay,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WigglesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Kinzua Res., LLC v. Or. Dep't of Envtl. QualityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. DeshawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API