State v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for failure to report as a sex offender. ORS 181.599. His sole assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state did not prove that he failed to report a “change of residence” within the 10-day period required by law. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant is a convicted sex offender, required to report to the appropriate law enforcement agency “[w]ithin 10 days of a change of residence.” ORS 181.596(4)(b)(A). He lived in an apartment in Coos Bay,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WigglesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Kinzua Res., LLC v. Or. Dep't of Envtl. QualityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DeshawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020