Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1895No. 7091PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

The plaintiff in error stands convicted of the offense of-larceny, as bailee, of a diamond ring of a value of more than $35, the property of one Catlin. The material and undisputed facts in the case, as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, are substantially as follows: Patrick Eord, Jr., the plaintiff in error, resided in the city of Fremont. A short time prior to the 7th day of March, 1894, he applied to the superintendent of the Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Yalley Railroad Company for the position of brakeman on that road, and was informed that in the near future he would be given work.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hopt v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Mathews v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Murphy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  5. Maher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API