Legal Opinion

Pulitzer v. Livingston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 2, 1896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Agreed Statement, This was an action of covenant broken, submitted to the law court on an agreed statement of facts which are found in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

More than forty years ago certain persons residing in England and France were the owners in fee of large tracts of real estate in America, particularly in the states of Maine, New York, Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia. These estates had formerly been the property of their ancestors, William Bingham,'of Philadelphia, and from whom the title descended, the “Bingham Estate,” so-called, embracing two million two hundred thousand acres in the state of Maine alone. These large landed estates were principally wild and unimproved, and required the management in this country of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Miller v. EwingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  3. Barnum v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  4. Hart v. SeymourIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Goldsborough ex rel. Goldsborough v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. Story Ex Rel. Story v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Melvin v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Shoemaker v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  5. Ryan v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API