Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Newman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 24, 1933No. 5202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in a suit by appellees, Enos S. Newman and Edwin A. Mooers, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Pierce Shoemaker, deceased, for a construction of certain trust provisions contained in the will.

The provisions of the will bearing upon this controversy are as follows: “I give, devise, and bequeath, all the rest, residue, reversion, and remainder, of my estate, real and personal, of whatsoever kind and wheresoever situated, whereof I shall die seized and possessed or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robert v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Armstrong v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Britton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Barber v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Helms v. ElliottTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Frank G. Johns, Jr. v. Edith Boardman CobbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Hilton v. Kinsey Williams v. Kinsey Little Sisters of the Poor v. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Read v. LeggDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Droney v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API