Legal Opinion

State v. Abbott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 2015No. 130230735; A154573PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Defendant, who concedes that he was properly convicted of first-degree theft, challenges his convictions for first-degree robbery, unlawful use of a weapon (UUW), menacing, and second-degree robbery. The charges that led to those latter convictions were premised on allegations that defendant used or threatened to use force in conjunction with committing the theft. Defendant raises eight assignments of error on appeal, all relating to a single issue: whether the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to ask defendant, who testified at trial, whether other witnesses had lied when they…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. PartainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. JamesMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. Pollock v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API