Legal Opinion

State v. Partain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 2019No. A166137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KISTLER, S. J.

*800Defendant appeals from a second-degree theft conviction for stealing merchandise from a Walmart store. On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court's ruling preventing him from vouching for his own testimony. The state concedes that the trial court erred in excluding that testimony, and the question on appeal reduces to whether the error was harmless. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that it was. We accordingly affirm the trial court's judgment.

Three witnesses testified at trial: a Walmart employee who reviewed surveillance videos taken while defendant was in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. HenleyOregon Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MaxonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. PolkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API