McCarty v. Kendall Co.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Motion by defendant under Ru’e 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss upon the following grounds: (1) that the plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy is before the South Carolina Industrial Commission, (2) that the plaintiff has failed to tender a return of any money received from the settlement alleged in the plaintiff’s Complaint, and (3) that the plaintiff does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for either fraud and deceit or breach of a contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. Plaintiff alleges in his Comp’aint that on May…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Levister v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- Gainey v. Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Riggs v. Home Mutual Fire Protection Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Taylor v. Palmetto State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hyman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- Ritter v. Allied Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968