Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Kendall Co.

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided June 21, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 4664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Motion by defendant under Ru’e 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss upon the following grounds: (1) that the plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy is before the South Carolina Industrial Commission, (2) that the plaintiff has failed to tender a return of any money received from the settlement alleged in the plaintiff’s Complaint, and (3) that the plaintiff does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for either fraud and deceit or breach of a contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. Plaintiff alleges in his Comp’aint that on May…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Levister v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. Gainey v. Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Riggs v. Home Mutual Fire Protection Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Taylor v. Palmetto State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hyman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  2. Ritter v. Allied Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API