Legal Opinion

Rosa v. Devingenzo

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1933No. 5897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action instituted to foreclose a real estate mortgage of $600, with interest. To the second amended complaint respondent filed a general and special demurrer, paragraphs 1 and 2 of which reads, as follows:

"I.
"That the said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the two defendants, Gennaro Devengenzo and Antonio Devengenzo, or either of them.
"II.
"That the said complaint shows plainly upon its face that the said action which is an action for the foreclosure of a certain mortgage is barred by the Statute of Limitations of the State of Idaho;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McLeod v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Noble v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resource Engineering, Inc. v. SilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Fortner v. CornellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Fortner v. CornellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. HirschIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API