Legal Opinion
Fortner v. Cornell
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1945No. 7222Published
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
GIVENS, J.
Respondents sought a rehearing on the ground that the following statements in the original opinion,
“The sole point now at issue is therefore whether the complaint states a cause of action, the other special grounds of demurrer not having been ruled on are not before us for consideration. (Rosa v. Devingenzo, 58 Ida. 213 at 216-17, 24 P. (2d) 1051.)”
“The allegations of fraud — aside from the application of the statute of limitations, which is not now before us and we do not consider — were sufficient as against a general demurrer. (Just v. Idaho Canal Etc. Co., Ltd.,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Buckner v. CalcoteMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.