Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Farris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 620PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was held for trial on five bills of indictment. Two of the bills were for robbery, two for weapons offenses, and one for conspiracy. The Commonwealth did not move for trial on the two weapons bills, and eventually these were nol prossed. A jury found appellant not guilty on the two robbery bills, and guilty on the conspiracy bill. Appellant’s post-trial motions were denied, and he was sentenced to 18 months to 3 years in prison. On this appeal he raises several issues, but we find it necessary to consider only one.

At the trial the only issue of substance was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. RansomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. EmerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Head v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API