Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ransom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1972No. Appeal, 141PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Roberts,

Appellant, Stephen Ransom, was eonvicted of first degree murder after a jury trial and sentenced to life imprisonment. He had been charged, along with two accomplices, with assaulting and robbing one James Bryant and causing Bryant’s death by fatal stabbing.

Appellant, tried alone, raises two contentions on this direct appeal: (1) the trial court improperly admitted into evidence over objection testimony summarizing the confessions of appellant’s accomplices, thus denying appellant his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation; (2) the use, over objection, of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. MayhueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. McCloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API