In the Interest of S.P.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Chief Justice.
The father of two children appealed from a judgment of the district court terminating his parental rights. He contended that the State terminated his parental rights without notice to him.
We transferred the case to the court of appeals. The court of appeals found there was insufficient evidence that the State had conducted a reasonably diligent search in attempting to serve him.
We granted the State’s application for further review and now conclude the court of appeals reached the correct decision. We therefore affirm the court of appeals decision and reverse the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Interest of AWNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Interest of HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Stubbs v. HammondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Rosenberg v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Qualley v. State Federal Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1992
3Cited by22 opinions
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- In the Interest of R.B.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
- in the Interest of P. RJ E.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In the Interest of D.F.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Ancrum v. Lyft IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.