Wright v. Anderson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Berkshire, J. —
The appellant was the plaintiff and the appellee the defendant in the court below. The complaint is in three paragraphs.
Separate demurrers were addressed to the second and third paragraphs, the cause of demurrer being want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrers were sustained and proper exceptions saved.
An answer in two paragraphs was filed, the first of which was the general denial.
A demurrer was addressed to the second paragraph of the answer, the cause of demurrer being want of facts sufficient to constitute a defence to the action. The demurrer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Elwood v. BeymerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Richardson v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McNelis v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- McIntosh v. MONROEIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Mitten v. Caswell-Runyan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Baltes v. Bass Foundry & Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Lieb v. LichtensteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.