Legal Opinion

Rich v. Campbell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1931No. 23061. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Rich, seeks recovery of damages for. personal injuries caused; as he claims, by the negligent driving by the defendant, Campbell, of his taxicab. Rich was a passenger in the taxicab. He alleged in his complaint that, by Campbell’s negligence, he was injured,

“ . . . and particularly was caused to suffer the following express injuries, to-wit: Complete fracture of right superior articulating process of fourth Lumbar Vertebra; crushing injury to superior articulating facets of fifth Lumbar Vertebra, both right and left side.”

The cause proceeded to trial in the superior court for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ChampouxWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. McCannWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Jordan v. Seattle Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mueller v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miles v. F.E.R.M. Enterprices, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Anderson v. HarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hutchinson v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  5. Carle v. Earth Stove, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API