Russell v. Dyer
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
This was a motion for a re-hearing of this cause after the opinion of the court had been delivered. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSarsent, J.
This case was argued at the July term, 1859. All the judges of the court, as then constituted, were present, but two of them did not sit in the hearing. The case was continued, and before the December term three of the judges had resigned, and four others were appointed, the number having been increased to six. At the December term only one of the former judges was present, the other being absent and having been of counsel. The four judges newly appointed were present, but one of them having been of counsel did not act. Since that time one resignation has occurred, but the judge appointed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. AmoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Mather v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Olcott v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Benson v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coburn v. First Equity Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Cahoon v. CoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
- Cahoon v. CoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
- Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977