Legal Opinion
MADRIGAL
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3274PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3274 Interim Decision #3274 In re Max Alejandro MADRIGAL-Calvo, Respondent File A41 260 865 - Fishkill Decided April 23, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where the statute under which an alien has been convicted encompasses offenses that con- stitute firearms violations and offenses that do not, the Immigration and Naturalization Ser- vice must establish through the record of conviction, and other documents admissible as evidence in proving a criminal conviction, that the specific offense of which the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- SHORTBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- BABAISAKOVBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- RAMOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- SWEETSERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- S-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.