Legal Opinion

McVean v. Coe

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 11, 1975No. 968-3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Plaintiff, O. R. McVean, commenced this action for specific performance of a lease-option agreement and for damages resulting from the breach of a hunting rights agreement. From a dismissal of his complaint, plaintiff appeals.

One basic issue is presented: Are the defendants Coe, and third-party defendants, Hooper, Risken and Farmer bona fide purchasers under their recorded executory real estate contracts of purchase, whose interests prevail over the plaintiff’s interest under his prior unrecorded lease-option and hunting rights agreements. We think not.

Mike Emerick, additional third-party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hudesman v. FoleyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kshensky v. Pioneer National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Reed v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Tomlinson v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Hallgren Co. v. Correl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API