Reed v. Eller
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
A real estate vendor repeatedly, but unwittingly, permitted his purchaser to make late payments on an earnest money agreement. Can he enforce a "time is of the essence" clause and declare a forfeiture? The trial court answered in the affirmative. The vendee maintains that strict performance was waived or that the vendor is estopped from enforcing the "time is of the essence" provision. We agree and reverse.
In the spring of 1977, Sidney Reed was shown a small parcel of Lewis County land by Mr. Hayertz, an agent for Sundown Land Brokers, Inc. Reed decided to purchase the property for $7,950 but…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Vacova Company v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- In Re McDanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1988
- Tomlinson v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- RAINIER NATIONAL BANK v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992