Legal Opinion
Hengel, Inc. v. Hot 'N Now, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 17, 1993No. 91 C 7616PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Hengel, Inc. (“Hengel”), Michael Henry and James Engel brought this suit against defendants Hot ’N Now, Inc. (“Hot ’N Now”), Julia Goff (“Goff’) and William Van Domelen (“Van Domelen”) claiming, inter alia, fraud, misrepresentation, and violations of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act. Defendants move to dismiss Counts I, II, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons explained below, defendants’ motion is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. E & E HAULING, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Pyramid Controls, Inc. v. Siemens Industrial Automations, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Jerry Morrison and Helen Morrison v. Back Yard Burgers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- To-Am Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.