Dickson v. Flynn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.
Appeal from a peremptory order of mandamus which directs the Secretary of State to file and record petitioners’ certificate of incorporation of “ Four-Boro Optical Corp.” That official bases his refusal upon the ground that the purpose clause in the certificate would permit the corporation to practice optometry, and that a corporation may not be organized for such purpose. He found authority for his refusal in Matter of Stern v. Flynn (154 Misc. 609) and in opinions by two Attorneys-General (Opinions of Attorney-General, 1913, 401; Matter of Right to Form a Corporation, 21 State Dept. Rep.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- McNaughton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Golding v. Schubach Optical Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Gate City Optical Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Williams v. MackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.