Legal Opinion
Elm Buick Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 25, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
On April 22, 1960, the defendant purchased a used 1957 Buick automobile from the plaintiff under a retail instalment (conditional sale) contract. See General Statutes §42-83 (e). The plaintiff assigned the contract, with recourse, to the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, hereinafter referred to as G.M.A.C., a sales finance company which financed the purchase of the car. See General Statutes §42-83 (i). The defendant became in default in the instalment payments called for . by the contract and, on October 25, 1960, G.M.A.C. retook possession of the automobile. At that time, the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Manhattan Taxi Service Corp. v. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Pacific Discount Co., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tauber v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Goodman v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Associates Discount Corp. v. TaylorDade County Small Claims Court · 1968
- Associates Discount Corp. v. WeldonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967