United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473 v. Hormel Foods Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
*181MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J.
¶ 142. (dissenting). I agree with the lead opinion's and the concurring/dissenting opinion's conclusion that Weissman v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 2013 WI App 109, 350 Wis. 2d 380, 838 N.W.2d 502, review granted, 2013 WI 3, 352 Wis. 2d 351, 842 N.W.2d 359, need not be overruled. However, I do not agree with the lead opinion's and the concurring/dissenting opinion's conclusion that Hormel must compensate its employees for the time they spend "donning and doffing" company-required "whites" at the Beloit cannery. Unlike a majority of this court, I conclude that the "donning and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mitchell v. King Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.