Legal Opinion
Richardson ex rel. Richardson v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 30, 2009No. 04-208VPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REMAND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This case is before the Court for review of the Special Master’s July 30, 2007 Ruling on Onset and July 31, 2009 Decision on Entitlement dismissing Steven and Lisa Richardson’s petition on behalf of their daughter, Megan Richardson, for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 et seq. (2006) (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners claim that Megan suffered seizures and related symptoms after receiving a Diptheria-Tetanus-aeellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccination on March 26, 2001 at age 6-1/2 months. See Doe v. Sec’y of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Murphy v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Campbell v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- K.L. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Spahn v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Doles v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- K.L v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.