Legal Opinion

Pace v. Pace

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 22, 1922No. 3181PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. An assignment of error upon a judgment awarding alimony and counsel fees in a proceeding under the Civil Code, § 2986, that such judgment is contrary to law, raises the question that the same is without evidence to support it; and a bill of exceptions to review such judgment, in which this is the sole assignment of error, will not be dismissed because the same does not specifically assign any error. Barksdale v. Brown, 16 Ga. 95; Holst v. Burrus, 79 Ga. 111 (4 S. E. 108); Mathews v. Parker, 124 Ga. 144 (52 S. E. 322); Harwell v. Marshall, 125 Ga. 451 (54 S. E. 93); Patterson v. Beck, 133…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patterson v. BeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Brisendine v. BrisendineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Babbitt v. BabbittIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Cambridge Tile Co. v. Scaife & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tilley v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Calhoun v. OzburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Varnadoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Wilkes CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API