Legal Opinion

Manuel Sanchez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1963No. 17726_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted on two counts 1 of an indictment charging violations of 21 U.S.C. § 176a. 2 On appeal he alleges error in that: (1) there was no probable cause for his arrest and consequently the evidence obtained in the search incident thereto was inadmissible; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in not granting his motion for a continuance ; (3) the court committed prejudicial error in not granting his motion to discharge counsel; and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

The evidence, viewed — as it must be 3 —in the light most…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. William Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Charles E. Dickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Charles Frederick Rocha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API