Legal Opinion
Totino v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 18, 1990No. File 101921-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In this administrative appeal, the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Stamford (board) has moved to strike both counts of a two count complaint.
The zoning enforcement officer of the city of Stamford issued a cease and desist order directing the plaintiff, Carmela Totino, to remove a basement apartment in premises that she owned at 16 Plymouth Road, Stamford. Although the zone where this property is located currently permits a structure containing only two apartments, the board concedes that the plaintiff is entitled to have three apartments because the units in her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Willard v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Fisher v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Cretaro v. Equitec Real Estate Investors Fund XIIConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zeigler v. Town of ThomastonConnecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Church of the Open Door v. Zoning Bd., Clinton, No. 65386 (Apr. 22, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Jurczak v. Town of Durham, No. 67480 (Apr. 5, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Morin v. Troymac's, Inc., No. Cv99 0171575 S (May 12, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.