In Re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants have renewed their motion to dismiss the claims of plaintiffs for punitive damages for the alleged wrongful death of relatives arising out of the Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974. Defendants have also renewed their motion for summary judgment on the same issue. 1
The Court by the Honorable Peirson M. Hall has previously decided that California law shall control the processing and trial of these cases. The re-affirmation of that decision requires that the Court now renew consideration of the questions raised by defendants’ motions and plaintiffs’ contention thereto that the law of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Umansky v. UrquhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hamrick v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Georgie Boy Manufacturing, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Johnson v. International Harvester Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.