Bradford v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
On the eighteenth of June, 1912, a dwelling house and other property known as the Mann property, in the part of the town of Charlemont called Zoar, were damaged by fire. It was contended that a spark from one of the defendant’s locomotives set fire to a mill of the Massachusetts Talc Company and that the *132fire thence spread to the premises in question. In answer to a specific inquiry submitted to them, the jury found that, “The fire that damaged the Mann property” was not “ communicated to that property by alocomotive engine of the Boston and Maine Railroad.” The title was in dispute, one Fred…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Holmes Realty Trust v. Granite City Storage Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Yardley v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Parkway, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.