Caranicos v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff, who was a passenger on the train of the defendant. Upon a consideration of the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, it appeared that when the train reached Taunton and came to a stop the plaintiff saw other passengers going out of the car ahead of him whom he followed; that as he reached the door there was a “big. jog,” which may be regarded as something more than an ordinary jolt, and a jerk which “shook him all over; that he lost his balance and tried to help himself and his fingers were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Weinschenk v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Faulkner v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Convery v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Hunt v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cuddyer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Burwick v. McClureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Tsacoyeanes v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Maher v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.