Convery v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These two actions were tried together. The first is brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the defendant’s cars; she will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff. The second is brought by her husband to recover for consequential damages arising from said injuries.
The plaintiff and her two nieces, six and eight years old, boarded a one man car, so called, of the defendant at a white post on Gorham Street in Lowell. The children went into the car first. The plaintiff paid her fare as she entered, and, seeing that her nieces had seated…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Whiteacre v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Johnson v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Bilodeau v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Anderson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Couris v. Casco Amusement Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Brennan v. Ocean View Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Belledeau v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Seidenberg v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Wade v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.